THE role of the world's oldest banking institute has been called into question after it failed to strip disgraced banker Fred Goodwin of its fellowship in the light of his catastrophic handling of the RBS affair.
The Edinburgh-based Chartered Institute of Bankers in Scotland, which once had Mr Goodwin as its president, has had its competency in rebuilding financial sector integrity challenged after it refused to bar the former knight.
The institute – the UK's leading provider of banking qualifications with around 10,000 members in 35 countries – felt that as it did not have any statutory or regulatory powers, it could not take action, and Mr Goodwin remains a member.
Now it has emerged Simon Thompson, the institute's chief executive, has been forced to defend its position after being criticised by the members of the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards. Commission chairman Andrew Tyrie said the institute's lack of action called into question whether the body could play a role in restoring public confidence.
The institute's code of conduct for fellows and members demands they "consider the risks and implications" of their actions, treat colleagues with "respect" and "uphold the name and reputation of the banking profession and the financial services industry".
However, the body, founded in 1875, whose stated aim is to help rebuild faith in banks and bankers, says it found it "very hard" to investigate conduct issues over Mr Goodwin.
Mr Tyrie said: "It's extraordinary. Every other private institution out there doesn't sit around waiting to find out whether Parliament is going to legislate to help it to decide who is suitable to be a member."
He said the institute's position gave "powerful evidence to suggest the body is not the one best suited to play a role in restoring standards".
Mr Goodwin, who lost his knighthood in February last year for bringing the honours system into disrepute, helped steer RBS to disaster, allegedly terrified his colleagues, and became a symbol for greed and hubris among bankers.
The institute is understood to have considered what to do after the Financial Services Authority (FSA) looked into the 2008 RBS collapse, which left tax-payers with a £45 billion bill and 82% of its shares.
The FSA report, from which some criticism of Mr Goodwin was removed by his lawyers, was seen as ambiguous. But one of the external advisers on the FSA file, Sir David Walker, told a Commons committee that it did amount to a censure.
Mr Thompson said: "It is a very simple thing. We need to know a regulator has imposed sanctions on him. Our rules say that when a regulator imposes censure or sanctions on an individual, we will remove them.
"He is on the FSA register and he is on the register of an accounting body, and neither body has seen fit to sanction him.
"We are waiting for regulators, who have the power to do these things, to take action."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article