UP to 250 jobs could go at a Scottish local authority which is aiming to save £24 million over the next four years.
Stirling Council has notified the Insolvency Service about the potential jobs threat as it looks to shave £9m off budgets in 2013/14 alone.
It said it hoped the bulk of the cuts will surround the termination of temporary contracts.
The Stirling branch of Britain's biggest public sector trade union, Unison, condemned the move which it felt pre-empted talks over budget plans.
James Douglas, Stirling Unison branch secretary, said: "We knew we were facing a challenging round of negotiations, but the employer's move to take this drastic action is totally unnecessary and unwarranted.
"It suggests that damaging decisions to cut vital services on which our communities – and indeed our members and their families – depend, have already been made.
"Some of the proposals coming forward are completely unwarranted."
Unison regional organiser David O'Connor added: "You can only cut so much before you reach breaking point. We are now at that point."
Stirling Council said it had to make "very challenging" reductions in the cost of the workforce and said there is "no doubt many employees will be unsettled by the options that are having to be looked at".
It added: "While the council wants to ensure its employees have a good package of terms and conditions, changes are, however, necessary to bring down costs."
It said the "extent of the reductions in costs required mean there will have to be job losses".
Stirling Council leader Corrie McChord said: "In preparing our budget we are examining all options for cutting costs and improving efficiency, rather than cutting services to our citizens."
A meeting on February 21 will be held to ratify the savings.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article