Around 16 million individuals and businesses calling the taxman for help face hanging on the line for more than five minutes, officials have said.
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) was attacked for its "low ambitions" after revealing it expects about 20% of the 80 million calls to their hotlines – many of which are 0845 numbers – will take longer than five minutes to answer.
Labour's Margaret Hodge, who chairs the Public Accounts Committee, said the industry norm was to take eight out of 10 calls within 20 seconds and dismissed the target as a "disappointment".
HMRC was condemned last year for costing callers £136 mil-lion a year through delays in answering phone calls.
Chief executive Lin Homer told MPs yesterday that cost was made up of the time people lost on the phone to the service and the cost of the call charge, which accounted for about £34m of the total.
"We think if we increase the number of calls handled to the 90% we've held in the last quarter of this year, that will about halve the time of the call," she told the Commons Public Accounts committee.
Ms Homer said that would see the four minutes 42 second average waiting time drop to about two minutes but said that did not include how long customers had spent dealing with interactive voice recognition systems.
"We think real people start counting the call from when they pick up the phone so we are going to measure that and we reckon that will mean we will be achieving a call of about five minutes to six minutes," she added.
Mrs Hodge said: "Eighty per cent in 20 seconds is the industry norm and you're going 80% in five minutes. I think it's a dis-appointment. It's unambitious."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article