THE high speed rail route in England that would have offered the most benefit to Scotland has been rejected in order to protect services to Lancashire, new documents show.
Route alignment options drawn up by HS2, the company set up by the Department for Transport to take forward its plans, included a connection from a new 250mph line from London to the West Coast line north of Preston.
This would have offered the best deal for passengers travelling north to Scotland as it would have cut journey times for Anglo-Scottish rail services, HS2 said.
But, in advice published on the DfT's website this week, it rejected this in favour of a junction south of Wigan to enable passengers from both Preston and Wigan to connect.
"Our key consideration here was that a connection further north would mean shorter journey times using HS2 (high speed rail) to Scotland; however, it would also mean that such trains would not be able to call at stations on the existing rail network between Bamfurlong and Brock," HS2 said.
The more northerly connection would have added £2 billion to the cost of building a high-speed rail network as it would have required a new interchange station to be built near Preston to maintain connections to Blackpool and other nearby stations.
The decision emerged amid a spat between the SNP and Scottish Labour over the lack of a concrete plan to bring high-speed rail to Scotland.
A spokesman for the Scottish Association for Public Transport condemned the route alignment favoured by the DfT, saying this ignored the benefits a line between Scotland and London would provide.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article