The number of police officers only able to perform restricted duties has almost trebled in five years, figures suggest.
There were 1,412 officers not able to perform all aspects of their job in 2011-12, according to statistics released under freedom of information law.
That compares with 560 in 2006-07 and means that around one in 12 police officers (8%) were on restricted duties last year.
In the Central and Tayside areas, one in seven officers (14%) were on restricted duties in 2011-12, compared with just one in every 33 (3%) in Northern Constabulary
Police can be put on restricted duties because of injury, illness or pregnancy.
Former Tory leader Annabel Goldie criticised the number of officers who have gone from "the frontline to behind a desk".
The Conservatives "forced the SNP in 2008 to deliver 1,000 extra police officers", she said.
"What good is that when there has been such an increase in those placed on restricted duties?
"This rise will have had a dramatic impact on Scotland and the public will want to know why this trend has developed.
"With the creation of a single police force for Scotland just around the corner, the SNP must do all it can to ensure we get this figure back down, otherwise public safety will be put at risk."
Miss Goldie pressed Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill on the issue in Holyrood.
Mr MacAskill said the number of officers on restricted duties is "fundamentally" a matter for the police.
"What I can say is that police officers tend to be on restricted duties for a variety of circumstances, for example pregnancy, and as we have an increase in the number of female officers, that's a factor that has to be taken into consideration," he told MSPs.
"Equally, officers who have suffered injuries, and tragically too many officers do suffer injuries in the course of their duties, also have to be protected.
"We currently have a record number of police officers in Scotland, which contributed to safer and stronger communities with recorded crime at a 37-year low."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article