You have to feel sorry for Michael O'Leary and Ryanair.
They sell an air ticket between Portugal and Dublin for probably about £50. The flight is cancelled because of a volcano in Iceland that neither Michael nor anyone else from Ryanair set off.
Then they are ordered by the European courts to pay the passenger £1000 for taxis, hotels, meals and maybe an entire wardrobe of clothes.
This is obviously unfair since Ryanair didn't budget in the £50 fare for putting the passenger up at a Hilton hotel, buying dinner and a new set of underwear from Primark.
It is unfair on me since the next time I buy a Ryanair flight there will be a new European compensation levy. In addition to existing fees such as the EU 261 levy, web check-in fee, ETS passenger fee, £10 for a reserved seat, £25 to check in a bag and £6 administration fee for Ryanair to administer the collection of the above sums of money.
Despite all these levies, there are times (usually on a dark January day) when I can fly from Prestwick to Barcelona (which God preserve) for £20. I am not part of some jet set. I have bought a ticket for a bus service with wings.
If the Icelandic volcanoes erupt again I don't expect a room at the Barcelona Hilton, to be taken to dinner at Set Portes, or bought Calvin Klein underpants from Corte Ingles.
A cup of tea, a sandwich and a kind word would be nice.
I have no experience of Ryanair crisis care. In 10 years of regular travel with Ryanair no flights have been cancelled. Only a handful have been late.
I am more worried about domestic bus travel. Apparently because of the cost of my bus pass, the system is under threat. Services will be cut back.
We will wait hours for a number 44. In which case I hope the European courts ensure we are properly compensated.
More than an hour's delay at the bus stop in Hope Street and I expect to be offered lodgings at the nice new Central Hotel. Or a voucher for something hot from Greggs.
The bus driver might even be equipped with a flask to provide a warming coffee. He will say: "Have a roll as well. Cheese and pickle or egg and cress?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article