A top Ryder Cup official has said the £75 fee which volunteers will need to pay to work at next year's golfing event will separate the "genuine article" from other time wasters.
Antonia Beggs, the event's operations director, said the widely criticised fee was introduced after the 2006 Ryder Cup in Ireland.
She said: "The K Club was a fantastic venue, but one of the key issues was that the volunteers didn't necessarily stick around to do their crowd marshalling jobs all day.
"After the event, we sat down with the chief marshal and our volunteer co-ordinators and they said the only way we could sort it out was by introducing a registration fee. That separates the genuine article from the rest.
"My job is to deliver an incredible spectator experience, so I want to get the best people as volunteers. I'm not remotely concerned what their age or background is so long as they deliver."
The tournament, to be held at Gleneagles in Perthshire next year, brings together Europe and America's finest golfers from September 26 to 28.
The 1800 volunteers now being recruited are being asked to stump up the £75 fee, which is said to cover expenses such as the cost of their uniform and food.
Last week, Labour MSP Patricia Ferguson said the fee would exclude many young Scots.
Stephen Boyd, assistant secretary of the STUC, said the scheme was "unacceptable" and designed to attract middle-class recruits.
However, despite the negative publicity over the £75 registration fee for the event, more than 8000 applications were received on the first day alone. Applicants will be told if they have been successful in mid-April.
Ms Beggs added: "There was negative publicity over the £75 fee, but it wasn't coming from our volunteers or golf fans. More than half of the applicants have been Scots, with the rest from 46 other countries, including one from Equatorial Guinea."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article