THE tax man has lodged an appeal against a ruling that found in favour of Rangers' use of controversial Employee Benefit Trusts (EBTs).
The Ibrox club argued the payments, thought to be close to £49 million, had been loans rather than wages and therefore not subject to tax.
It comes three months after a First Tier Tax Tribunal found in Rangers' favour in the so-called "big tax case". It stated the "controversial monies received by the employees were not paid to them as their absolute entitlement".
Now HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has taken action on its pledge to fight the tribunal's ruling and it will now be heard at the Upper Tax Tribunal (UTT).
It argued the loans were in effect player and staff wages, which should make them liable to income tax and National Insurance.
It was the prospect of the EBT tax debt that many believe was the key to Rangers' financial difficulties, with Lloyds Banking Group insisting club debts were cleared, sparking the disastrous move to sell to Craig Whyte.
If the HMRC appeal were successful, the debt would be added to the millions left behind by the old club company, now known as RFC 2012 plc, and would have little effect on the new club company headed by Charles Green.
In November, Lord Hodge approved a winding-up order which moved RFC 2012 plc out of administration and into the hands of liquidators. Liquidators BDO are responsible for distributing what is left of the old Rangers company to creditors as part of the liquidation process.
HMRC, which has previously said it was disappointed by the First Tier Tax Tribunal decision, has been granted leave to appeal.
If there is yet another appeal after the UTT hearing, the case will go to the Supreme Court – a process which could take years rather than months to resolve.
The first tier tribunal ruling, endorsed by two judges with one dissenting, stated the "controversial monies received by the employees were not paid to them as their absolute entitlement". They were considered to be loans that can be repaid.
The dissenting opinion came from Dr Heidi Poon, who concluded the money received by the employees through the trust constituted earnings for income tax purposes.
After the verdict, Rangers chief executive Mr Green said that the tax tribunal's finding "undermines the validity" of the Scottish Premier League's own investigation into alleged undisclosed payments to players.
Rangers made payments on behalf of several players and directors through the 81 sub-trusts between 2001 and 2010.
Hearings in the case took place in Edinburgh towards the end of 2011 and concluded in January this year.
Oldco Rangers went into administration on February 14, last year, nine months after Mr Whyte bought Sir David Murray's 85.6% shareholding in Rangers for £1.
Administrators Duff & Phelps were appointed by Mr Whyte with the company up to £124m in debt. HMRC subsequently rejected proposals for a creditors' agreement that would have allowed the old club to continue.
Rangers' assets, including Ibrox stadium and the Murray Park training complex, were sold to a consortium led by Mr Green in a £5.5m deal in June, last year.
EBTs were commonly used to enable companies to minimise the income tax and national insurance charges on pay to high-earning employees and directors, as well as allow those companies to claim corporation tax deductions on payments into the trust.
However, many of the previous tax advantages of that particular arrangement were removed as part of the 2011 Finance Act.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article