THE man cleared of the World's End killings of two teenage girls decades ago has opposed moves for him to be put on trial for a second time.
In a legal first in Scotland, prosecutors want to try Angus Sinclair again for the murders and have applied to the courts for his 2007 acquittal to be set aside.
He had been accused of murdering 17-year-olds Christine Eadie and Helen Scott, but denied the charges.
The two girls were last seen leaving Edinburgh's World's End bar in 1977 and their bodies were found in separate locations in East Lothian the following day.
The bid follows changes made to the centuries-old double jeopardy principle, which prevented a person being tried twice for the same crime.
The Crown yesterday began new proceedings at the Appeal Court in Edinburgh, with Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland, QC, Scotland's top prosecutor, addressing three judges on procedural issues.
A further procedural hearing has been scheduled for May 14.
Defence QC Ian Duguid, representing Mr Sinclair, said: "As far as the application is concerned, I can indicate that, after discussion with the respondent [Mr Sinclair], the application is opposed."
He said the defence wanted to look into whether what was being put forward "constitutes new evidence at all".
Further court sittings could see judges hearing some of the evidence which prosecutors would intend to lead in any future retrial.
Mr Sinclair was not present for the court hearing, before Lord Carloway, sitting with Lord Menzies and Lady Smith, due to a medical condition.
Mr Mulholland said it is decades since the killings and the families were anxious to have finality in the matter, with the Crown ready to proceed to a full hearing on the issue.
The Lord Advocate said: "There are tests, hurdles, which require to be overcome."
He said that involved the court considering whether the case was substantially strengthened by new evidence and whether a reasonable jury would convict on the basis of new evidence and previous material.
Mr Mulholland said it was estimated eight days would be sufficient for a hearing on the Crown application to set aside the acquittal.
Mr Sinclair's trial for the murders collapsed in 2007 after Lord Clarke ruled there was insufficient evidence for the case to go to the jury.
A second prosecution can be launched under new double jeopardy laws if a strict set of criteria are met, including whether new evidence or a confession comes to light.
This is just one of a number of cases being considered by the Crown to revisit under the new laws.
Others include the murders of Indian waiter Surjit Singh Chhokar in Overtown, North Lanarkshire, in 1998, and drama student Amanda Duffy in Hamilton in 1992. Both cases are currently being looked at by police.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article