A PROBE into what caused fertility rates to half at Scotland's largest IVF unit has been shelved with investigators unable to explain what led to the problem.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GGC) launched an inquiry in November last year after fertilisation rates at Glasgow Royal Infirmary's Assisted Conception Unit (ACU) plunged from about 30% to close to 15% between September 1 and November 9. It was thought air pollutants from building works on the floor above may have been to blame.
Patients using the Royal's service were subsequently transferred to the city's private Nuffield hospital, with women who had undergone IVF during the period under investigation offered a complimentary treatment cycle. The Nuffield is continuing to cater for around 25 NHS patients per week with the service not expected to return to the Royal until the end of this year.
However, the hospital's own in-house investigation has now been wound up with mystery remaining as to what caused the dip in fertility rates – although clinical error has apparently been ruled out.
A report has been passed by the health board to the UK regulator, the Human Embryology and Fertility Authority (HEFA), which is expected to respond to the findings in the next few weeks.
Meanwhile, NHS GGC has appealed to other private fertility clinics to tender for contracts to take on some of the NHS patients who will be unable to use the Royal, to ease the burden on the Nuffield hospital.
It comes as work begins on the £1 million refurbishment of the ACU, including the fertility laboratories at the centre of the investigation.
A spokeswoman for NHS GGC said: "A clinical review was commissioned, led by the clinical director responsible for the Assisted Conception Service, which looked at clinical processes within the ACS unit and other broader environmental factors that may have impacted on success rates.
"The review was unable to establish conclusively the exact nature of the cause of the drop in success rates although it does appear the decrease in success rates was not as a result of clinical practices.
"As such we have decided that in the medium term the Assisted Conception Service should continue to be provided off site in the private sector while a significant £1m refurbishment of the unit, including laboratory facilities, is carried out.
"The refurbishment is already under way and we expect a full return of the service to the Glasgow Royal Infirmary by the end of 2013. During this time we have been in open dialogue with HEFA and it has been informed as to the outcome of the clinical review."
Professor Richard Fleming, director of the private Glasgow Centre for Reproductive Medicine, said it was not surprising investigators were unable to get to the root of the problem.
Mr Fleming said: "I'm certainly not surprised because even if you find something interfering with the survival of these [embryo] cells, how are you going to test them?
"I imagine that when they return to the site they will bring in better measures for air cleaning which will go some way to providing reassurance to patients."
It had been thought building works on the floor immediately above the unit may have disrupted the process, which is extremely vulnerable to contamination. Tiny amounts of dust, paint fumes and chemical vapours entering laboratories via ventilation shafts are all known to pose a potential danger to embryos being prepared for implantation.
The GRI is used by women and couples from NHSGGC, NHS Lanarkshire, NHS Ayrshire and Arran and NHS Dumfries and Galloway.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article