A struck-off lawyer is suing a Scottish aristocrat for £4.25 million following the theft and recovery of a Leonardo da Vinci painting stolen from a castle.
Marshall Ronald is pursuing a similar claim against the chief constable of a Scots police force that led the hunt for the missing masterpiece.
Mr Ronald was acquitted with others of a conspiracy to extort £4.25m for the safe return of the masterpiece at a trial at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2010.
The Madonna of the Yarnwinder was stolen from the Duke of Buccleuch's Drumlanrig Castle, Dumfriesshire, in 2003.
A covert operation eventually led to its recovery following a meeting at the offices of a law firm in Glasgow on October 4, 2007. Mr Ronald and others who had attended were detained.
He is now pursuing a compensation claim in the civil courts against the Duke of Buccleuch and Chief Constable Patrick Shearer of Dumfries and Galloway.
He claims that under the terms of an alleged contract between him and an undercover officer, known as John Craig, it was agreed he would arrange for the return of the painting in return for sums totalling £4.25m.
He maintains some of the money was being paid to people who could assist in the painting's recovery and £2m being transferred to a Swiss account in the name of Mr Ronald.
The duke and Mr Shearer are both defending the action at the Court of Session in Edinburgh. The duke denies entering such a contract and maintains any alleged contract would be unenforceable as being illegal and contrary to public policy.
During a hearing senior counsel for the duke described it as "a hopelessly irrelevant case" and the QC acting for the senior police officer said the summons was "plainly irrelevant and quite frankly nonsense".
Alan Cowan, for Mr Ronald, told the court a legal aid application had been made but a decision was not expected until March and sought to have a stay put on proceedings until then.
Maria Maguire, QC, for the chief constable, told the court: "It is patently obvious that John Craig was an undercover officer who was acting at all times within that role.
"It cannot be possibly held with any degree of credibility he was at any time acting as an agent of the Duke of Buccleuch or that he was entering an agreement on behalf of the chief constable of Dumfries and Galloway with this individual."
She said there was a provision in legislation for police acting under authorisation in such roles being excluded from civil liability. She said there was no suggestion the conduct was unauthorised or unlawful.
The court heard Mr Ronald,56, of Lancashire, was struck off as a solicitor. A disciplinary tribunal said he allowed himself to become involved in "a dubious transaction".
During his trial two co-accused, Robert Graham and John Doyle, were also acquitted. They ran an online business, Stolen Stuff Reunited, and had been contacted by an intermediaries of those holding the painting. They consulted Mr Ronald.
Lord Doherty said he was not prepared to exercise his discretion to put a stay on the action and awarded expenses against Mr Ronald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article