TWO critics of the past policies of the nation's main arts funding body, Creative Scotland, will help choose its new chief executive.
Vicky Featherstone, former artistic director of the National Theatre of Scotland, and award-winning author Janice Galloway – who last year said "something is wrong at the heart" of Creative Scotland – will be on the interview panel for the body's new chief executive.
Creative Scotland's board said it had finally agreed to the process of appointing a successor to Andrew Dixon, who resigned last year after a year of criticism and protest.
The post will be advertised later this month, and interviews will take place before the end of April. The salary for the post has yet to be determined, a spokeswoman said, although Mr Dixon was paid £130,000.
Until then, Iain Munro, director of creative development, which distributes around £80 million in Government and National Lottery funds, is essentially in the lead position at the body.
A statement from Creative Scotland said: "Following the search for suitable applicants, a shortlist will be compiled and interviewed by a panel.
"The make-up of the interview panel reflects the board's recently stated commitment to be inclusive of the communities it serves."
It includes Ms Featherstone, who is now the director of the Royal Court Theatre in London, Ms Galloway, Fiona Dalgetty, musician and chief executive of Fèis Rois, and Chris van der Kuyl, chief executive of digital company Brightsolid.
The panel will be led by Sir Sandy Crombie, chairman of the Creative Scotland Board, and will also include board members Peter Cabrelli, Steve Grimmond and Ruth Wishart and a representative of the Scottish Government.
Prior to this, in the week beginning February 18, the senior management team will announce dates and locations for a series of open sessions to take place in March and April.
Around March 4, the board also intend to publish an "action plan for the process of change" at the body over the next year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article