ONE of the accused in the Lynda Spence murder trial told his former partner he had held her at a house, a court has heard.
Jacqueline Watt, 38, said David Parker originally told her he was "babysitting" a man but he later admitted it was Ms Spence, who disappeared in April 2011.
Ms Watt yesterday told the High Court in Glasgow that financial adviser Ms Spence had arranged a mortgage for her in 2009. She described Ms Spence as a "dodgy broker" and said she and Parker were watching publicity about Ms Spence's disappearance on the news.
She told the court: "I said, 'that's the lady that got me my mortgage, do you think she's either bumped the wrong person or done a runner because she owes so much money?'.
"David was quite agitated and he said, 'that's the him'. He had told me [previously] he was babysitting a man who was in trouble with money, keeping some man safe in a house. But he said it wasn't his house.
"I asked him, 'what do you mean that's the him?'. He said, 'it wasn't a him, it was a her'.
"He was saying, 'you don't understand, I can't tell you'. He was upset, agitated, scared. He was in fear.
"I just thought he was talking gibberish."
Ms Watt also said Parker accused her of wearing a wire, but she had told him, "you've been watching too much CSI".
She claimed the conversation about "babysitting" took place in April or May 2011, and Parker told her about it being Ms Spence about a week before he was arrested in connection with her disappearance.
The court also heard Ms Watt visited Parker in Barlinnie prison on December 23, 2011, when he gave her information he wanted passed to the police or his lawyer. She said she noted some of what was said on the back of an envelope.
Parker, 38, Colin Coats and Philip Wade, both 42, and Paul Smith, 47, deny murdering Ms Spence, 27.
The trial before Lord Pentland continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article