The UK Government's controversial flagship welfare to work scheme has been criticised by MPs for its poor track record, with some providers only achieving jobs for two out of every 100 people.
MPs warned the Work Programme, which had seen only 3300 out of the 86,420 participants in Scotland secure a job by last summer that had lasted more than six months, was "extremely poor".
The House of Commons Public Affairs Committee (PAC) said the programme is failing the young and those with disabilities in particular.
Using official figures from the first full year, a PAC's report found that between June 2011 and July last year none of the UK's 18 providers, including two in Scotland, met their contractual targets.
Some helped just 2% of those on their schemes into employment.
The average was only 3.6% UK-wide, less than one-third of the 11.9% target set by ministers and less than if the Coalition had done nothing at all.
The Government had stated it was prepared to pay up to £14,000 per case, and up to £5 billion over five years, to help people into work.
But there was concern in Scotland when it was revealed that leading social enterprises, such as the Wise Group, had missed out on contracts in favour of private companies.
Margaret Hodge, the Labour MP and PAC chairwoman, said the programme's performance was not only extremely poor, but "so poor that it was actually worse than the department's [Work and Pensions] own expectations of the number of people who would have found work if the programme didn't exist".
She added: "None of the providers managed to meet their minimum performance targets.
"The programme is particularly failing young people and the hardest-to-help.
"It is shocking that of the 9500 former incapacity benefit claimants referred to providers, only 20 people have been placed in a job that has lasted three months, while the poorest performing provider did not manage to place a single person in the under-25 category into a job lasting six months."
Ms Hodge, who wants failing providers called to account, warned that the payments system was not helping hard-to-reach cases amid increasing evidence of "creaming and parking".
MPs also warned that due to the poor results, there was a high risk that one or more of the providers will go bust or see their contracts cancelled.
John Downie, director of public affairs for the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, the umbrella body for voluntary groups, said it provided further proof the scheme was not working.
He added: "The only thing the scheme achieved was allowing private companies to make millions on the back of the misery of worklessness."
TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady said: "The Government's Work Programme has spectacularly under-achieved, even by its own modest targets. It has failed those in greatest need, especially unemployed young and disabled people."
Katja Hall, from the CBI, said: "The programme is in its infancy and gains will come over the longer term."
The Department for Work and Pensions said the report was skewed. A spokesman added that 31,000 people have been in a job for more than six months and more than 200,000 were off benefits and in employment.
"It is making a real difference to tens of thousands of the hardest to help jobseekers," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article