Six men pleaded not guilty when they appeared in court yesterday in connection with terrorism charges.
Jewel Uddin, 27; Omar Mohammed Khan, 28; Mohammed Hasseen, 23; Anzal Hussain, 24; and Mohammed Saud and Zohaib Ahmed, both 22, all appeared via prison video link at Woolwich Crown Court in south-east London charged under Section 5(1) of the Terrorism Act 2006.
They are jointly accused of preparing an act or acts of terrorism between May 1 and July 4 last year.
The men, from Birmingham, face an allegation that they took part in activities including the manufacture of an improvised explosive device, the acquisition of firearms and other weapons and the purchase of motor vehicles connected with the charges.
Hasseen is also accused of possessing a document or record containing information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism on July 3, which he also denied yesterday.
The charges follow a series of arrests by the West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit, assisted by the North East Counter Terrorism Unit.
Uddin, Khan and Hasseen were arrested after the routine stop of a Renault Laguna by police on the M1 near Sheffield on June 30.
It was alleged that a cache of weapons was found in that vehicle, along with a note addressed to the English Defence League, which was planning a rally in South Yorkshire that day.
Hussain, Saud and Ahmed, who were arrested on July 4, were allegedly travelling in a gold Rover which was in a convoy with the Laguna.
The men spoke only to confirm their names and enter their pleas.
They were remanded in custody until a further hearing at the court on March 25.
A provisional trial date has been set for May 7.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article