A STRIKING difference in honey-bee survival rates between the east and west of Scotland has been recorded by scientists, prompting calls for more action to tackle the species' decline.
A team at Dundee University studied more than 600 colonies across the country in 2011/12.
Of 274 colonies checked in the east of the country, 58, or 21%, failed, but just 14 of 286 colonies failed in the west, about 5%.
Scientists believe the presence of intensive agriculture and large areas of oilseed rape in the east could be linked to the difference.
But they criticised the fact that data on pesticide use is not gathered, saying the current system makes it impossible to properly determine what is causing honey bees to die.
The study was carried out with the help of the Scottish Beekeepers Association.
Dr Christopher Connolly of the university's division of neuroscience, who led the research, said he was stunned by the findings.
He said: "It's a fantastic lead. If only we knew what was being used in those places. What we do have in the east and not the west is intensive agriculture.
"It could be that the lack of natural habitat is the cause. It may be that bees and other pollinators may not be getting such a balanced diet. In the west, it's largely wild crops that they are feeding on. It could be that the intensive agriculture and intensive levels of pesticides are contributing to the failure."
There were also marked differences in death rates in the east. Colony losses in parts of Fife were as high as 30% while Edinburgh lost less than 6%.
A further study led by Dr Connolly analysed colony failure rates over winter. Of 89 colonies which had fed on oilseed rape, 27 failed. Just 13 out of 82 colonies which had not fed on rape died.
Dr Connolly believes nicotine-based pesticides, neonicotinoids, may contribute to deaths of bees feeding on the crop.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article