FROZEN burger sales are down by almost half and frozen ready meals by 13% in the wake of the horsemeat contamination scandal.
The figures come despite consumers suggesting they would be happy to eat the product in future.
Further research has found a significant number of consumers would be happy to eat horsemeat providing it was "safe" and properly labelled.
Retail analyst Kantar Worldpanel found that consumers changed the products they bought following the food scandal, which broke on January 16.
Director Edward Garner said: "The issue has so far only affected the performance of individual markets rather than where consumers are choosing to shop. For the four weeks ending February 17, frozen burger sales were down 43% and frozen ready meals declined 13%, demonstrating a change in shopping habits."
Separately, a survey of almost 14,000 meat-eaters found 51% would buy horsemeat as long as they knew it was bred for eating and was therefore safe.
Of those who said they would eat horse, 29% said it would need to be cheaper than beef. However, 48% said they would refuse horsemeat outright, even it if was free, consumer website moneysaving expert.com found.
Meanwhile, traditional beef pies have been taken off the menu by Aberdeen FC in the wake of the horsemeat scandal after its supplier, Sodexo, took the decision to withdraw its beef products as a precaution.
Scotland's head of the Food Standards Agency described the horsemeat scandal as a "wake-up call" to the food industry.
Director Charles Milne said the watchdog was working hard to restore the public's confidence in food.
Mr Milne described the incorrect labelling of meat products as a "huge breach of trust".
He said: "I think this has been a real wake-up call for the food industry in terms of its responsibility to consumers.
"This is a really serious issue. While it is not a health issue, it is really serious."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article