A surgeon's plea to hold face-to-face talks with the widower of a woman he killed in a car crash has been rejected by a sheriff.
Dr Benjamin Kendrick, of Chesham, Buckinghamshire, offered to meet Robert Johnston in a bid to agree a compensation claim.
The doctor was found guilty of killing Joan Johnston by driving carelessly and accepted liability at Perth Sheriff Court for damages relating to her death. But he is refusing to pay the full £300,000 claim and insists the victim's 30- stone (190.5kg) weight should have a bearing on the level of compensation.
Yesterday Dr Kendrick's solicitor Carla Melville said: "Substantial offers have been made by the defender and it is felt further negotiations could be successful."
However, Clair McArthur, for Mr Johnston, said: "My instructions are to oppose any continuation."
Dr Kendrick, 36, has questioned how long Mrs Johnston, 57, would have lived – as a result of her weight and the likely associated health difficulties – had she not died in the road crash.
The court was told experts were studying her life expectancy with a view to it making an impact on the amount of compensation the doctor would offer.
Dr Kendrick was fined £5000 and banned from driving for three years but walked free partly because of his victim's weight.
Sheriff Michael Fletcher ruled out jailing Dr Kendrick because his victim could have survived if she had been of average size.
Mr Johnston, 63, said: "The fact he's disputing this really makes it worse."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article