A CALL has been made to extend the UK's biggest national park for a second time to stop large wind-farm developments close to its boundaries.
Ramblers Scotland said the boundaries of the Cairngorms National Park should be increased to the west to block wind farms currently under consideration in the Monadhliath Mountains between the A9 and Loch Ness.
The park, created 10 years ago, was extended in 2010 to take in parts of Highland Perthshire. The park's area was increased by 20%, and it now covers almost 6% of Scotland.
Dave Morris, director of Ramblers Scotland, said it was now clear the western boundary of the national park was far too close to the central part of the Cairngorms massif.
He said this was the finest example in the UK of truly wild, unspoilt mountain landscape, akin to the wilderness areas of northern Scandinavia.
"How can we possibly compromise the integrity of this national park by allowing wind farms, such as the Stronelairg and Allt Duine proposals [a total of 98 turbines] , to be built close to its western boundary?" he said.
Meanwhile, four charities are trying to raise £30,000 to pay for legal costs in an action against the park authority's plan for 1500 new homes near Aviemore, plus 117 at Carrbridge, 300 at Kingussie and 40 at Nethy Bridge.
In September, the Court of Session rejected their challenges, but the charities are appealing and there will be a hearing on March 12.
Craig Macadam, a director of one of the groups, Buglife, said: "To consider developing on these sites without proper assessment of the potential adverse impacts on wildlife is unacceptable."
lA new chief executive today takes over at the Cairngorms National Park Authority. Grant Moir was previously director of conservation and visitor experience at Scotland's only other national park, Loch Lomond and the Trossachs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article