NORTH Korea has threatened to scrap an armistice that ended the 1950-53 civil war if South Korea and Washington continue their two-month-long war games.
The warning came after United Nations diplomats said the US and China had struck a tentative deal on a draft UN Security Council sanctions resolution that would punish North Korea for its third nuclear test, which it completed last month.
A spokesman for the Korean People's Army (KPA) Supreme Command warned: "We will nullify the Korean armistice.
"The war exercise being done by the United States and the puppet South Korea is a systematic act of destruction aimed at the Korean armistice."
The two remain technically at war since the conflict ended in a truce, not a peace treaty.
The spokesman added: "We will be suspending the activities of the KPA representative office at Panmunjom (truce village) that had been tentatively operated by our army as the negotiating body to establish a peace regime on the Korean peninsula.
"Related to that, we will be making the decision in parallel to cut off the Panmunjom DPRK-US military hotline."
North Korea, officially called the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), has made much of hotlines with the South and the US, but has not been known ever to have used them in times of increased tension.
About 200,000 Korean troops and 10,000 US forces are expected to be mobilised for their defensive Foal Eagle exercise, under the Combined Forces Command, which began on March 1 and goes on until the end of April. Separate computer-simulated drills called Key Resolve start on Monday.
Speaking yesterday, UN diplomats said they hoped to receive the draft resolution on North Korea for that day's council session. They added they would like to see the council vote on it by the end of the week.
The UN press office also said Russia, which holds the presidency of the 15-nation Security Council this month, would convene closed-door consultations on North Korea yesterday.
China's Foreign Ministry declined to confirm it had reached a deal with the US.
Spokeswoman Hua Chunying said: "China supports an appropriate response from the Security Council and oppose North Korea conducting its nuclear test.
"At the same time, we are resolute in believing the relevant response has to be prudent and moderate, has to prevent an escalation, be conducive to the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula, prevent nuclear proliferation and maintain the peace and stability of north-east Asia."
Council diplomats have said they would like to strengthen the provisions in previous sanctions resolutions adopted after North Korea's 2006 and 2009 nuclear tests, above all those related to the inspection and seizure of shipments of banned items and toughening financial restrictions.
The Security Council condemned North Korea's third nuclear test last month, and vowed to take action.
Pyongyang said at the time the test was an act of self-defence against US hostility" and threatened stronger steps if necessary.
In January, the Security Council passed a resolution expanding UN sanctions against North Korea due to its December rocket launch and warned Pyong-yang against further tests. North Korea responded by threatening a new atomic detonation, which it then carried out the following month. North Korea's previous tests prompted the Security Council to impose new sanctions.
Beijing has supported all previous sanctions resolutions against Pyongyang but only after working hard to dilute proposed measures. It has been concerned tougher sanctions could further weaken the North's economy and prompt refugees to flood into China.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article