A leading Labour strategist has been condemned for tweets referring to "Poles and Pakis" during an online spat over independence which has also involved former First Minister Jack McConnell.
Ian Smart spoke of an independent Scotland "turning on Poles and Pakis" and later likened the SNP to the Ku Klux Klan.
Mr Smart, former president of the Law Society of Scotland, is a prominent blogger on his party's affairs.
He was promoting a blog reflecting on Labour's failings following the South Shields by-election when he was asked on-line about the view that a No vote in the 2014 independence referendum could usher in a decade of Tory rule.
Mr Smart responded: "Better 100 years of the Tories than the turn on the Poles and the Pakis that would follow independence failing to deliver."
There was a flood of tweets objecting to both the use of the phrase "Poles and Pakis" and the suggestion that a post-independence Scotland would be racist. Former Socialist MSP Carolyn Leckie urged him to "stop digging".
Mr Smart responded to Ms Leckie: "Who seriously thinks I'm a racist? Only those for whom the cap fits. What are you doing in their company?"
Former First Minister Lord McConnell commented on long-time ally Mr Smart and suggested his critics may be "feeling guilty". This brought one response: "You are a former First Minister, don't get into this ****".
An SNP spokesman said of the exchanges: "It is only a few days since Labour's Douglas Alexander called for a respectful referendum debate, yet these nasty tweets have been posted by prominent Labour blogger Ian Smart.
"The tweets are highly offensive, not just to everyone who supports a Yes vote, but more particularly to Scotland's Pakistani community."
Lord McConnell said today: "I abhor racism, whoever is the target and whatever the context. I wish others were as consistent."
Mr Smart conceded last night: "I've been caught up in a bit of a Twitter storm over the last 24 hours."
But he began by blaming critics as "cybernats" and said he should have put the offending reference to "Poles and Pakis" in quotes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article