SIR Tom Hunter has criticised the poor standard of debate between the main players in the battle over Scotland's future and said he has not decided how to vote in next year's referendum.
Sir Tom, one of Scotland's most successful entrepreneurs, accused both sides of failing to provide answers to the key questions for voters to decide whether the country should stay in the UK or become independent.
The currency in an independent Scotland and the country's future relationship with Europe and Nato were two crucial areas where more facts were required, the tycoon said.
Sir Tom, who made £290 million when he sold his Sports Division retail chain to JJB in 1998, added: "I think we've had the skirmishes but we've got to get into the real fight and I'm really looking forward to it. I guess I'm impatient for some of the answers."
He added: "I'm your classic swing voter and I'm there to be convinced by either side."
With supporters of independence and the Union jockeying to win the endorsement of key business figures, Sir Tom's comments will make uncomfortable reading for politicians in both camps, who insist their preferred constitutional arrangement would be best for the stewardship of the economy.
His remarks come less than 500 days before the referendum vote on September 18, 2014.
An Ipsos Mori telephone poll yesterday of 1000 people put those against independence at 59% and 31% in favour; the highest support for Scotland staying in the UK since August 2011.
The Ayrshire businessman said: "On the independence side, they need to start coming out with some hard facts to hard questions, and on the Better Together side I would say 'tell me why we're better together, not why we shouldn't be independent'... because we're a pretty stubborn race and if someone keeps telling you you can't do that and you can't do this we might just say, well, yes we can.
"I would rather see a more positive, 'right, here's why we're best with the Union, here's what it's going to be like, here's what we're offering' because if all they're offering is the status quo that's no use.
"People like to know tomorrow will be better than today."
In February, Sir Tom said the No campaigners were digging themselves into a hole if they believed a dual "status quo" and "scare them to death about independence" message would work.
He was also critical of the Scottish Government, saying Alex Salmond had to develop a clearly defined and costed programme for independence in 2014.
Yesterday, he noted: "Alex Salmond is a master of painting the picture of here's the utopia that we're all going to find the other side of the referendum."
Asked what hard questions are not being answered by the pro-independence camp, Sir Tom said: "There seems to be a scare story every day, so currency – what's the facts? Europe – what's the facts? Nato – what's the facts?"
While Sir Tom remains undecided, other prominent entrepreneurs appear to have chosen sides.
In February, travel trade tycoon John Boyle said he thought it would be an "economic and social catastrophe of epic proportions" to split from the UK.
A Better Together spokesman said: "We welcome Sir Tom's comments. We will be spending every day between now and the referendum promoting the many positive reasons why we are better and stronger together with the rest of the UK."
A Yes Scotland spokesman said: " Sir Tom is absolutely right in demanding straight answers to straight questions. We believe that Scotland should be run by a government that its own people vote for – not a cobbled-together coalition that Scottish voters never wanted.
"Yes Scotland will work very hard over the coming months to provide Sir Tom, and everyone else in Scotland, with the answers to the questions that will convince them that the only way forward is to vote Yes."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article