A SENIOR Cabinet minister has risked the ire of millions of teenagers – and grown-ups – by attacking the vampire novel series Twilight.
Aberdeen-born Michael Gove used a speech on education to suggest young people should read Middlemarch, George Eliot's classic tale of provincial life, instead.
Railing against a culture he said had low aspirations for the future of too many children, he also appeared to take a swipe at John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men as he called for young people to read more novels written before the 20th century.
Reading charities criticised Mr Gove's comments accusing the minister of "still living in the Victorian era".
In his speech, Mr Gove said Twilight author Stephenie Meyer "cannot hold a flaming pitch torch to George Eliot. There is a great tradition of English literature – a canon of transcendent works – and (Twilight novel) Breaking Dawn is not part of it."
And he appeared to criticise the use of too many 20th-century texts in English schools, singling out Of Mice and Men and the novel which helped William Golding win the Nobel Prize for literature Lord of the Flies.
However, he also went on to praise schools where children were expected to read authors who include not only Dickens and Shakespeare but also Neil Gaimen, the cult fantasy writer, and Phillip Pullman, who wrote the Northern Lights series.
But Marc Lambert, chief executive of reading charity the Scottish Book Trust, said Mr Gove was "out of touch".
"It appears Michael Gove was born in the 1880s and is still living in the Victorian era," he said.
"Here's a man clearly in favour of ignoring the vast corpus of evidence that informs modern reading and educational practice, in favour of making education and even reading an ideologically driven issue."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article