DRAFT plans to exploit underground gas in central Scotland could permit the release tens of thousands of tonnes of methane gas into the atmosphere over 25 years.
An official field development plan drawn up last year for Dart Energy's disputed coal-bed methane project at Airth, near Falkirk, says it will be allowed to release up to five tonnes of gas per day for safety reasons.
The Australian company will also be able to burn off gas in flares "on an emergency basis".
Dart has applied for planning permission to sink 22 wells at 14 sites to extract up to 60 billion cubic feet of methane at Airth.
The application has prompted more than 1500 objections, has been delayed by local authorities and is now being considered by the Scottish Government.
Last week, Falkirk Council agreed to urge the Government to hold a public inquiry into the plans.
Extracts from the draft 2012 field development plan for Airth have been released to the campaign group, Frack Off Scotland, by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and the Department of Energy & Climate Change in London after appeals under freedom of information law.
"This licence to vent potentially massive amounts of methane is another reason unconventional gas is such an environmental disaster," said Ed Pybus from Frack Off Scotland.
Dart pointed out that controlled venting of methane was sometimes required to ensure safe operation and maintenance.
"Consent for this would be considered at the appropriate time by the regulator following assessment of requirements and impact," said a company spokesman.
"This consent, in line with industry standards, describes a limit and it would be highly misleading to imply that this could be a routine occurrence."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article