IN his speech to MSPs, Alex Salmond placed great emphasis on groundbreaking Holyrood legislation from parliaments past - the smoking ban, land reform and his own, as yet unenforced, minimum price for alcohol.
His point was a simple one: the Scottish Parliament, not Westminster, is the place to look for initiatives that will improve the lives of Scots.
There was no equivalent eyecatching bill in his programme for the coming 12 months. How surprised should we be? Was this a piece of canny politics or a missed opportunity?
It's certainly true the Scottish Government wants nothing too controversial to deal with in the run-up to next year's referendum. Ministers are not in the business of making enemies if they can avoid it, especially now.
However, we've seen plenty of previous legislative programmes without a genuinely big idea and many with fewer bills than this year's total of 13. MSPs are definitely not being given a gap year to go off and explore the constitution.
Ending automatic early release, or at least beginning the process for around 100 to 150 of the country's most dangerous offenders each year, will be popular and also highlights the failure of previous administrations to make any progress at all.
Licensing schemes for air guns and lap dancing bars and outlawing the purchase of alcohol on behalf of youngsters hanging around the corner shop also show ministers delivering things people actually want.
Of the business left over from the last session, MSPs still have to pass the referendum bill paving the way for the vote and legislation allowing same-sex marriage, which will bring criticism from religious groups but cross-party consensus in the chamber.
If the year ahead looks a tad unexciting it has at least been judged to complement the real political business in hand. And we all know what that is.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article