THE final piece of land bought by the Scottish Government for the doomed Glasgow Airport Rail Link project has been sold back to its original owner for £50,000 - just five years after ministers paid more than £840,000 to acquire it.
The four plots at 57 Clark Street in Paisley were sold to Airlink Group, whose subsidiary company originally owned the land, in a private transaction after they failed to achieve the reserve price at auction in Edinburgh, The Herald can reveal.
The three-acre site next to the Paisley St James railway station, nicknamed the "Paisley triangle", comprises the last of 13 plots of land sold by the Scottish Government since the £210 million Garl project was axed four years ago.
It went under the hammer at SVA auction house in Edinburgh on June 26 with a guide price of £50,000, but failed to sell. However, The Herald understands it was bought immediately afterwards for £50,000 after representatives from Airlink Group approached the auctioneers with an offer for a private sale.
A spokesman for SVA confirmed that the purchase had been completed in late July.
The deal means the Scottish Government recouped just 6% of what it paid to acquire the site in May 2008, while Airlink Group - whose Glasgow headquarters were officially opened by First Minister Alex Salmond in February last year - has profited by at least £790,000 from the public purse.
According to records held by Registers of Scotland, the plot was sold in February 2008 by Airlink Security Park Ltd, the car parking subsidiary of Airlink Group, to SPT - the agency in charge of Garl at the time - for £840,125.
Businesses forced to relocate were also paid substantial compensation by taxpayers before the Garl project was scrapped in September 2009.
Since buying back the land, Airlink has turned it back into a car park. The Herald previously reported that governments are obliged to dispose of land bought through compulsory purchase powers which is no longer required, with previous owners offered first refusal.
The eight other Garl plots were sold off between 2011 and last year.
However, critics have accused the Scottish Government of offloading the sites to prevent an airport rail project being revived.
It comes a week after The Herald reported that the progress of an independent consultation on transport solutions for Glasgow Airport had stalled after Transport Scotland bosses became nervous about the inclusion of an airport-city rail link among a shortlist in April.
Councillor Gordon Matheson, leader of Glasgow City Council, said: "The Scottish Government is hell bent on sabotaging attempts to revive plans for a rail link to Glasgow Airport. They seriously miscalled the decision to cancel Garl in 2009, and this latest underhand attempt to hive off the required land has more to do with an assessment of their party political interests, than the economy of west central Scotland. "
James Kelly, Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Infrastructure, said: "This is a shocking waste of public money. It further highlights the own goal of the SNP government in cancelling the Garl project."
Halting the branch line element of Garl saved around £176m, said a Transport Scotland spokesman. He added that the "area has benefited from around £230m in rail infrastructure improvements alongside a new £430m fleet of Class 380 trains" on nearby lines.
Airlink declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article