A EUROPE-WIDE study which claims Scotland's extra spend on healthcare was making little difference to the performance of the NHS has been branded "deeply flawed".
Scottish ministers also accused the Euro Health Consumer Index (EHCI) of being "based on dubious data at best" and draws on 12-year-old news reports.
The Herald reported yesterday the EHCI ranked Scotland 13th in the league table, with England 14th. The EHCI scores patient care in 35 countries, including in eastern and central Europe, against 48 different criteria ranging from waiting times for treatment to levels of superbug infection to the number of infant deaths.
The Netherlands topped the index with 870 points out of a possible total of 1000, while NHS Scotland was awarded 719 and NHS England 718.
Health Secretary Alex Neil said the NHS in Scotland was benefiting from moves to protect its budgets. He added: "This is in stark contrast to the UK Government's actions south of the Border, where the coalition's programme of privatisation in NHS England is growing ever-more pronounced and damaging.
"Waiting times are at among their lowest-ever levels, care is safer than it has ever been, levels of premature mortality have been further reduced, and patients continue to rate their care very positively.
"The NHS in Scotland is continuing to perform well and lead the way in comparison to the rest of the UK. For example, while the median wait for bypass surgery is 37 days in Scotland, its 56 days in England and 135 days in Wales. The OECD have also stated earlier this year that in terms of waiting times in Scotland were performing well in comparison with other countries of the United Kingdom."
Professor Jason Leitch, clinical director of NHS Scotland, also questioned the validity of the EHCI.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article