HUNDREDS of Turkish police officers have been sacked and some moved to traffic duties, further undermining a fraud investigation Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan portrays as a covert attempt by a rival to usurp state power.
Mr Erdogan, facing the biggest challenge of a 10-year rule that has seen the military banished from politics, the economy booming and Ankara pressing its influence in the Middle East, portrays the operation as a "dirty plot" by followers of a US-based Islamic cleric.
Fethullah Gulen, who does does not back any political party, enjoys broad influence in the police and judiciary.
The Turkish government has hit back by sacking or reassigning hundreds of police across the country since the investigation began last month, while a second investigation into large infrastructure projects championed by Mr Erdogan has been blocked.
Around 350 officers in Ankara, including members of the financial and organised crime, smuggling and anti-terrorism units, have now been dismissed or reassigned to new roles including traffic or district duties.
Prosecutors, meanwhile, have deepened their investigations, with at least 25 more people including public officials detained as part of an investigation into the activities of a port in the Aegean province of Izmir.
Timothy Ash, head of emerging markets research at Standard Bank, said: "Neither side appears willing to give up at this stage in this high-stakes battle for control of the state."
Mr Erdogan and the Hizmet movement of cleric Fethullah Gulen, which exercises influence through a network of contacts built on sponsorship of schools and other social and media organisations, accuse each other of manipulating the police and compromising the judiciary's independence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article