THE family of Mark Duggan has reacted with fury as an inquest jury found his death at the hands of a police marksman was lawful, despite him being unarmed when he was shot.
Dramatic scenes erupted at the Royal Courts of Justice in London as the decision by the jury of seven women and three men triggered outbursts from family and friends who branded police "murderers" and hurled abuse.
Large numbers of officers were on duty in the UK capital last night in a bid to avoid a repeat of the arson and looting during the immediate aftermath of the shooting.
Dozens of protesters gathered outside Tottenham police station chanting "racist murderers" and carrying placards which read "no justice, no peace".
Outside court, Mr Duggan's brother Marlon shouted after the jurors saying "f**k them", and angry supporters spilled from the courtroom and kicked at a door.
Mark Duggan, whose death sparked riots and looting across England, was gunned down when police stopped the taxi in which he was travelling in Tottenham, London, in August 2011.
At the culmination of the four-month inquest, the jury found that although the 29-year-old had a gun in the minicab, he most likely threw it onto a verge as soon as the car came to a stop.
Outside the court, Mr Duggan's family claimed he was "executed" and branded the judgment "perverse".
Mr Duggan's aunt Carole Duggan said: "The majority of the people in this country know Mark was executed. We are going to fight until we have no breath left for Mark and his children."
His brother Shaun Hall said: "We came for justice today, we don't feel we are leaving with justice."
Police watchdog the Independent Police Complaints Commission said it was looking at new evidence that had emerged from the inquest, and the Duggan family are now considering whether to try to get the inquest conclusion judicially reviewed.
Their solicitor Marcia Willis-Stewart said: "On August 4, 2011 an unarmed man was shot down in Tottenham. Today we have had what we can only call a perverse judgment.
"The jury found that he had no gun in his hand and yet he was gunned down.
"For us, that's an unlawful killing."
As her words were interspersed with shouting from a gathered crowd, she said the family were in a state of shock, adding: "They can't believe that this has been the outcome. No gun in his hand and yet he was killed - murdered as they have said."
Emotions boiled over outside the court building as assistant commissioner Mark Rowley made a statement. He could not be heard and protesters jostled journalists. The angry crowd shouted "murderer" and "murdering scum". Others called out "who killed Mark Duggan? The police killed Mark Duggan."
Mr Rowley said criminals had shot dead more than 50 people in the UK capital in the past three-and-a-half years. "No officer sets out to run an operation that results in someone dying. But the task our officers face in making split-second decisions when confronting armed criminals means there is a risk - a very small risk - that this will happen."
Mayor Boris Johnson said Met officers face incredible pressure, but have opened fire only six times in the past four years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article