NOT that she's obsessed, you understand, but Labour's Johann Lamont has a bit of a thing for the independence White Paper, a thing for throwing it at Alex Salmond's head.
Her opening gambit of 2014 was to lob it out of a fog of statistics in the hope the FM didn't have time to duck. It worked.
Why, she asked, did the Rough Guide to Eckistan only compare Scotland's economy to that of small European countries from 1977 to 2007? Why not something more recent?
His senses keenly tuned to the whine of an incoming fact, Mr Salmond looked pale.
Ms Lamont had locked onto a monster.
The FM had left out the Crash.
Before 2008, plucky small nations were held up to show what Scotland could do on its own.
If only we'd had their GDP, we'd all be £900 a skull better off, the FM had swooned. But after the Crash, many of those economies fell like lemmings into a fjord.
If Scotland had mirrored them post-2007, we'd be worse off, Holyrood officials now say.
Not that you'd know it from the White Paper, however; the stats boys at ScotGov HQ had left out the crash as it was too "volatile".
Casually sidestepping this bombshell, Mr Salmond talked instead about free school meals.
Ms Lamont glowered until her fringe smoked.
The FM was cherrypicking numbers to boost his case while failing to price his policies, she wailed, and "a shopping list without a price list is just a wish list".
The FM tried to chortle in the face of adversity. "Oh dear," he said weakly.
As per tradition, Tory Ruth Davidson then asked when he would next meet the PM.
"Well not in Scotland by the sound of it," he replied, referring to David Cameron's admission that he's not every Scot's cup of Irn-Bru. "He's too posh and he's too unpopular."
But Ms Davidson was ready: "I thought the Prime Minister showed a self-deprecation that seems wholly foreign to the First Minister. Perhaps he could take note." Even Nicola Sturgeon chuckled. Those stats again in full: Opposition 2, FM 0.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article