THE Scottish Government has been accused of airbrushing the recession from its independence White Paper in an attempt to present a rosier economic case for leaving the UK.
First Minister Alex Salmond yesterday came under fire over a government analysis comparing Scotland's economic performance with a group of small independent countries from 1977 to 2007 - the year before the banking crisis.
The figures, which are cited extensively in the blueprint, suggest Scotland would have been better off as an independent state over the 30-year period.
However, new economic modelling, looking at the period 1982 to 2012, including the recession - showed Scotland would have been worse off by up to £2400 per person as an independent country.
The new figures were produced by Holyrood's politically impartial information centre.
Seizing on the revelations during the First Minister's Questions, Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont asked why the First Minister had "hand-picked" out-of-date figures for the White Paper.
She told MSPs: "The First Minister is asking the people of Scotland to trust his white paper. But it looks back to a period which favours the First Minister's case when over the last 10 years, the last 20 years, the last 30 years, the overwhelming evidence is we would have been worse off."
Speaking later she added: "To try to make their figures work, the SNP have tried to airbrush the banking crisis out of their figures.
"They have suppressed the real numbers and don't expect people to notice that they have fiddled the figures.
"The SNP's contempt for the truth and the people of Scotland is breathtaking."
The First Minister quoted separate government figures showing an independent Scotland would been less in the red, compared with the UK, to the tune of £12 billion over the past five years.
He said: "£12bn is a great deal of money, that could have been used to invest in the Scottish economy, to promote Scottish jobs, it could have been used to borrow less."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article