CLASHES between police and protesters loyal to Egypt's ousted president have killed three people on the first day of a key vote on the country's new charter.
Violence in the city of Sohag came hours after Egyptians started voting on the new constitution, which represents a key milestone in a military-backed roadmap put in place since the removal of the Islamist Mohammed Mursi last July.
A massive security operation is underway to prevent Mr Mursi's supporters from disrupting the vote and in anticipation of attacks by Islamic militants.
The officials say police opened fire on about 300 pro-Mursi protesters after the officers came under fire from rooftops during a rally.
The new constitutional text strips out disputed Islamist language while strengthening state institutions that defied Mr Mursi: the military, the police and the judiciary
With no sign of a campaign against the constitution, the draft is expected to pass easily, backed by the many Egyptians who staged mass protests on June 30 against Mr Mursi's rule before he was deposed. The Brotherhood had called for a boycott of the vote.
Many Egyptians backing the plans cite a desire to bring stability to the country after three years of turmoil ignited by the historic uprising that felled veteran autocrat President Hosni Mubarak in 2011.
The vote that may set the stage for a presidential bid by army chief General Abdel Fattah al Sisi. His Islamist opponents say he is the mastermind of a coup that kindled the worst internal strife in Egypt's modern history and revived an oppressive police state.
But after a failed experiment with democracy, many are weary of the upheaval that has gripped this nation of 85 million and shattered its economy. They view General Sisi as someone who can stabilise the country.
Analysts say his candidacy in a presidential poll now seems a foregone conclusion as there appeared to be no alternatives. He inspected a polling station after voting began, dressed in desert coloured fatigues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article