The Syrian Government has handed a local ceasefire proposal to the Russian co-sponsors of peace talks with rebels that are due to start next week.
There was no immediate response from President Bashar al Assad's opponents, whose attendance at the talks in Switzerland remained in doubt - prompting a last-minute appeal to them from the US.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem, on a visit to Moscow, said he had given Russian officials a plan for a truce in Aleppo, Syria's biggest city, and said the government was ready to exchange lists of prisoners to be swapped.
Moscow and Washington, which favour opposing sides - respectively for and against Assad - have urged both parties to make concessions including ceasefires, access for aid and prisoner exchanges to build confidence before the conference.
But there is little sign of coherent negotiating positions or of violence abating. Rebels are fighting each other, in battles involving Islamist militants whose influence has cooled Western support for the uprising. Mr Assad's forces, once reeling, have recovered and reportedly been bolstered by new Russian arms and supplies.
Most of the disparate rebel forces fighting inside Syria have dismissed the negotiations, known as Geneva-2, and opposition leaders backed by Western and Arab powers met in Turkey to decide whether to take part. It remained unclear when they would reach a final decision.
The United States, the co-sponsor of the talks with Russia, issued an 11th-hour appeal to Mr Assad's opponents to participate in the first direct peace negotiations in nearly three years, to end a civil war that has killed more than 100,000, driven millions from their homes and inflamed tensions across the region and beyond.
The Syrian National Coalition, a fractious 120-member body, has already seen some of its members declare their hostility to joining the talks at Montreux - many fearing it will undermine their credibility at home to engage in a process they see as having little chance of forcing Mr Assad to step down.
"The United States ... urges a positive vote," US Secretary of State John Kerry said on Thursday.
"The Geneva peace conference is not the end but rather the beginning, the launch of a process ... that is the best opportunity for the opposition to achieve the goals of the Syrian people and the revolution."
Mr Kerry also poured scorn on "revisionism" from Damascus, which has made clear it rejects rebel and Western demands that Mr Assad make way for a transitional leadership and has suggested talks focus on cooperation against "terrorism" - code for the Islamists, including al Qaeda, that dominate on the front lines.
"Syria ... is the strongest magnet for terror of any place today," Mr Kerry said. "It defies logic to imagine that those whose brutality created this magnet ... could ever lead Syria away from extremism and towards a better future."
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said of the opposition's delay in agreeing to take part: "It worries us very much that some kind of game is being played."
Mr Lavrov called again for Tehran, Mr Assad's main sponsor in the region, to be represented at the conference - something other powers have resisted on the grounds that Iran has not endorsed the view that an interim administration should be established to end the conflict.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article