NEARLY two-thirds of industry players believe the UK shale gas sector is at least 10 years away from making a significant impact on UK energy supplies, according to a survey.
While 64% thought 10 years was a reasonable estimate, 13% thought it could take up to 20 years.
The study published today by international law firm Pinsent Masons, also found that 55% of respondents felt confident that Scottish independence would not impact on the industry's ability to attract overseas investment.
Local opposition to fracking and "nimbyism" was viewed by 55% as the biggest barrier to shale gas becoming a valuable domestic resource
However, 55% also thought a Scottish Government proposal for buffer zones around fracking sites would hinder the pace of development.
The survey canvassed the views of 100 prominent players in the UK shale industry.
Bob Ruddiman, the Aberdeen-based head of energy and natural resources at Pinsent Masons, said: "We are at the beginning of a shale gas revolution and we must recognise that significant investment of time and money is required to ensure success.
"The indigenous UK technological supply chain presents a genuine opportunity for us to emulate the success experienced with unconventional gas in the US where it has been truly transformational for the supply chain and consumers.
"Injecting funds into our supply chain is essential if we want to experience the type of boom seen across the Atlantic. We have the opportunity to provide this funding and focus on the infrastructure and technology we need to ensure shale gas features highly in the UK's future energy supply."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article