SCOTLAND'S police watchdog has found numerous failings in the handling of a missing person inquiry that ended with the discovery of the vulnerable man's body.
Professor John McNeill has recommended changes to procedures and additional training at E Division of Police Scotland following the death last year.
The 37-year-old man found dead, who suffered from mental ill health and had a history of self-harming, was a patient at the Royal Edinburgh Hospital.
He was reported missing by the hospital last September 8 when he did not return from a weekend visit to his mother's home.
Police did not force entry to his Edinburgh home until six days later. It was clear the man had been dead for some time, though the date and time of death has not been determined. There were no suspicious circumstances.
The report by Professor McNeill, the Police Investigations & Review Commissioner, found it should have been apparent the man was a vulnerable person and the inquiry should have been graded as higher risk rather than low risk, as it was.
His report said police should have forced entry to the man's home on September 10 after his mother voiced "significant" concerns.
Mr McNeill said: "In this case there were repeated failures to update the Police National Computer with appropriate warning signals, which would have informed the missing person inquiry."
He also recommended that whenever people are reported missing from Royal Edinburgh Hospital police should make a physical visit to the hospital to ensure they obtain all the appropriate background information.
Chief Superintendent Mark Williams, local police commander for Edinburgh, said: "Since this incident was reported, the division has made several changes to protocols to ensure they align with national procedures."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article