THOUSANDS of lives could be saved if heart attack treatment in the UK matched that of Sweden, research has shown.
Between 2004 and 2010, one-third more Britons than Swedes died within a month of having a heart attack, a study found.
More than 11,000 deaths could have been avoided if UK care standards were as good as Sweden's, the authors claim.
The team assessed quality of care and outcomes for all heart attack patients treated in hospital in the UK and Sweden from 2004 to 2010.
In total, records relating to 391,077 patients from 242 hospitals in the UK and 119,786 from 86 hospitals in Sweden were assessed and analysed.
Results said that 30 days after a heart attack, 10.5% of UK patients discharged from hospital died, compared with 7.6% in Sweden.
Taking into account a variety of influences, they estimated that 11,263 lives could have been saved by matching Swedish standards.
Co-author Dr Tomas Jernberg, from the Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden, said: "Procedures to open up constricted coronary arteries, were used more often and earlier in Sweden, where they were applied in 59% of cases compared with 22% in the UK."
Drugs such as beta blockers were also less likely to be prescribed to British patients.
Dr Mike Knapton, associate medical director at the British Heart Foundation, said:"Sweden's early adoption meant they saw the benefits quicker and this is reflected in the figures. However, the UK has caught up and last year the majority of patients received this treatment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article