THERE is "no guarantee" that there would be a common travel area between an independent Scotland and the rest of the British Isles, Alistair Carmichael has insisted.
He addressed the issue as he published the latest Whitehall analysis paper, which extols the virtues of the UK's current system of border management.
The SNP Government argues that, unlike other new members of the European Union, an independent Scotland would not sign up to the Schengen Agreement - the passport-free zone which covers almost all of the EU - but would continue to have a common travel area with the rest of the UK and Ireland.
However, fears have been raised that, to prevent an independent Scotland, with a different immigration policy, becoming a soft entry point to the rest of the UK, border posts would have to be set up between England and Scotland.
This assertion was dismissed out of hand by the SNP as "scaremongering".
Mr Carmichael said: "We have got a system that, for all its occasional difficulties like any other bureaucracy, is fundamentally sound and gives people in Scotland, as part of the UK, a measure of security."
He added: "Something we have is good. For those who want to take us away from that, it is for them to explain why what we would have (under independence) would be better."
In response, Nicola Sturgeon claimed the latest paper "from the Project Fear library lacks all credibility", ignoring the Coalition's 22% staff cuts to the UK Border Agency as well as the Scottish Government's own proposal for a Scottish Border and Migration Service.
The Deputy First Minister said: "The only people wanting to erect borders are Mr Carmichael's own colleagues in the Westminster Government, who are threatening to drag Scotland and the UK out of the EU and the single market.
"It's time for less Project Fear and more common sense."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article