VETS in Scotland are backing a ban on the use of wild animals in travelling circuses.
The British Veterinary Association (BVA) spoke out after the Scottish Government launched a consultation on the ethics of the practice.
A ban is expected to come into force in England in 2015 and although there are no travelling circuses based in Scotland, there are four in Britain that use wild animals and stage performances north of the Border.
Robin Hargreaves, president of the BVA, said: "BVA vets have been quite clear that the welfare needs of non-domesticated, wild animals cannot be met within the environment of a travelling circus, especially in terms of accommodation and the ability to express normal behaviour.
"We strongly support a ban of wild animals in travelling circuses and would like to see all administrations in the United Kingdom ban this unethical practice."
The consultation states: "Many people now consider it outdated, morally wrong and potentially harmful to make wild animals perform circus tricks and acts that they would not otherwise perform naturally, simply to entertain or impress a paying public.
"There are also related concerns regarding the potential impact of wild animals in travelling circuses on developing attitudes towards animals in children and young people.
"The main factor that we need to consider from an ethical perspective is whether a modern Scottish society considers that the exhibitions and performances required of wild animals in travelling circuses compromise respect for animals and are therefore objectionable."
The BVA said it would repeat its call when it responds officially.
BVA Scottish Branch President Ronnie Soutar added: "A travelling circus is no place for wild animals."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article