THE voters of Cowdenbeath have told Alex Salmond "to get on with his day job", and stop obsessing with the constitution or grandstanding on the international stage, Scottish Labour have claimed.
Leader Johann Lamont was speaking in the constituency yesterday, hours after her party's thumping two-to-one victory over the SNP, taking a 56% share of the vote to their opponents' 28%.
She said: "It's a very significant result and I believe people in this area have responded to our positive campaign on jobs, education and support for older people.
"These are the issues they want politicians to be focusing on, and that's what Alex Rowley will be doing as an MSP. I think voters are telling Alex Salmond to get on with his day job."
Mr Rowley said: "The priorities I have are the things that came up on the doorstep time and time again; unemployment, youth unemployment, giving young people the best chance in life, tackling a housing crisis in the top side of this constituency."
Given a slightly disappointing turnout of 34.78% it was a terrific night for Labour, a poor night for the SNP, a decent night for the Tories, a pleasing night for Ukip, and a shocker for the party pushed into fifth place, the Liberal Democrats.
SNP strategists openly talked about how the mid-term effect in this session may be taking them back to where they were in 2007, but they insist the party is doing well.
The seat has been vacant since the death of Labour MSP Helen Eadie in November last year, just days after it emerged she was being treated for cancer. Mr Rowley has for a year been an aide to former Prime Minsiter Gordon Brown, and he pledged to stand down as leader of Fife Council.
He has faced bitter disappointment in the past, particularly in 2011 when he expected to take back Dunfermline from the Liberal Democrats only to lose the seat unexpectedly to the SNP.
Natalie McGarry, who came second with 5704 votes, said: "I am confident that there will be a Yes majority in September. I heard on the doorsteps from a lot of traditional Labour voters who said: 'Listen, Natalie, I'm not going to vote for you, but I am actually thinking about voting Yes in the referendum.'"
Ms Lamont dismissed Ms McGarry's comments, saying: "I think we've got to a stage ahead of September where we don't believe a word the SNP say about anything.
"I think they maybe need to stop talking to each other and listen to what people in the real world are saying about their concerns."
SNP business convener Derek Mackay MSP insisted the result indicated the party's underlying strength in Scotland, with a share close to that in 2007 when the SNP won.
"The SNP fought a strong campaign with an excellent candidate in Natalie McGarry and we made the issues of the by-election the issues that matter to the people - the council-tax freeze, free school meals and extending childcare," he said.
Local councillor Dave Dempsey, who came third for the Conservatives with 1893 votes, achieved one of the surprise results in Thursday's poll. He said: "You could not buy the effort, dedication and enthusiasm that I have had at my disposal over the last several weeks. We're getting there."
He had a point. The Tories were the only party to increase both their percentage share and number of their vote while on a reduced turnout everyone else's was falling.
Denise Baykal came fourth for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) with 610 votes while Jade Holden was in fifth place for the Liberal Democrats with 425 votes.
Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie put a brave face on a terrible result in the home constituency where he was raised, saying of his candidate: "In a crowded two-horse race Jade made her voice heard on Liberal Democrat commitments for lower taxes, higher pensions and more jobs.
"This is the positive message which we are taking to the Scottish voters."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article