The man accused of the Boston Marathon bombings is to be sentenced to death if convicted, despite the abolition of the penalty in the state of Massachusetts.
Civil liberties groups reacted angrily to the news that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 20, is to be put to death if a jury finds him guilty at his trial.
Three people died and 264 people were injured in the attacks on one of America's biggest running events last April. It was one of the largest terror attack on US soil since September 11, 2001.
Attorney General Eric Holder said he would authorise trial prosecutors to seek the death penalty against Tsarnaev.
Mr Holder, who made the decision hours before today's deadline, said: "The nature of the conduct at issue and the resultant harm compel this decision."
Seventeen of 30 charges against Tsarnaev carry the possibility of the death penalty, including using a weapon of mass destruction to kill. The 20-year-old has pleaded not guilty. No trial date has been set.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts pointed out the trial would go ahead in a state that had scrapped the death penalty decades ago.
"I wish Federal officials would have respected the clear wishes of the people of Massachusetts, who were on the front lines in this tragic event," said executive director Carol Rose.
It follows a newspaper poll last year that found 57% of Boston residents favoured life in prison for Tsarnaev, if he is convicted, with 33% in favour of his execution.
Prosecutors say Tsarnaev, and his brother Tamerlan, 26, planted a pair of homemade pressure-cooker bombs at the race's crowded finish line. The dead included an eight-year-old boy.
It is alleged the brothers later killed a university police officer and later engaged in a shootout with police that left Tamerlan dead.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article