Honeymoon murder suspect Shrien Dewani has lost his High Court bid to block extradition until he is fit to stand trial.
A panel of three judges headed by Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas said Mr Dewani could be extradited if the South African government gave a crucial promise.
Lord Thomas said extradition would not be "unjust or oppressive" if officials undertook to return Mr Dewani to the UK if, after "a year or other stated reasonable period", mental illness still prevented a trial.
A lawyer for the South African government said it was "delighted" with the court's ruling and expected it would be able to give the undertaking, but needed 14 days for "clarification".
Referring to the fact Mr Dewani's wife Anni died more than three years ago, Lord Thomas said: "The interests of justice require expedition and that there should be no further delay, provided proper protection is afforded to the appellant."
Mr Dewani, from Bristol, can still try to take his case to the Supreme Court. He is accused of ordering the killing of Anni, 28, who was shot as the couple travelled in a taxi on the outskirts of Cape Town in November 2010.
The court heard he has mental health problems and is compulsorily detained in hospital under the Mental Health Act. His lawyers have stressed he will be willing to defend himself at trial once he is fit to do so but they say he is unfit to plead under English law and his "prognosis is not certain".
Amit Karia, Anni's cousin, said: "We are happy with the judgment. We have waited for it for three years, three months."
But he warned there was still a possibility Mr Dewani could launch another appeal and said: "We are always worried and don't take anything for granted."
Three men have been convicted over Mrs Dewani's death. Xolile Mngeni was given life for premeditated murder, taxi driver Zola Tongo was jailed for 18 years and Mziwamadoda Qwabe for 25 years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article