The case against Coronation Street's William Roache is "nonsense", with the trial haunted by the spectre of Jimmy Savile, a court has heard.
Louise Blackwell, QC, defending Mr Roache, poured scorn on the idea that the actor turned from "perfect gentleman" to a sexual predator and back again, she told the jury.
Mr Roache, 81, who plays Ken Barlow in the ITV soap, is accused of using his fame and popularity to exploit "star-struck" youngsters in the late 1960s and early 70s.
His trial, now in its third week, has heard from five women who claim he sexually assaulted them when they were 16 or under, either at Granada Studios in Manchester, in his car or at properties he owned between 1967 and 1972.
He denies all the charges and has told the jury at Preston Crown Court he has no knowledge of any of the women.
In the defence case's final submissions to the jury, Miss Blackwell said: "Jimmy Savile has affected, in fact, infected this trial and investigation of these offences.
"The Jimmy Savile allegations, for example, related to when he went around hospitals or vulnerable children's homes. They will know whether he was there, there will be records. One of the things in this case is there is no records."
Mr Roache, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, denies two counts of rape and four counts of indecent assault.
Miss Blackwell said to the jury: "What the prosecution say is that for some weird reason between 1965 and 1972, for no discernible reason, Mr Roache departed from his usual character and behaviour and became a young woman-snatcher, a risk-taker, taking people into toilets. It's nonsense."
The trial was adjourned until Monday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article