Jurors in the trial of Coronation Street star William Roache were told yesterday to leave emotions aside in dealing with a "head-on conflict of evidence".
Mr Roache, 81, who plays Ken Barlow in the ITV soap, is accused of using his fame and popularity to exploit "starstruck" youngsters in the late 60s and early 70s.
His trial at Preston Crown Court has heard from five women who say he sexually assaulted them when they were 16 or under, at Granada Studios in Manchester, in his car, or at his properties between 1965 and 1972.
In denying all the offences, Mr Roache says he did not know any of his accusers and had never had a sexual interest in under-age girls.
Summing up the case, Mr Justice Holroyde told the jury: "There is a head-on conflict of evidence. The principal question you will have to ask yourself on each of the charges will be a stark one. Are you sure that Mr Roache committed the sexual act which the complainant says he did?
"Emotions must play no part in your decisions. It would only distract from your solemn duty in accordance with the oath or affirmation you made at the start of the trial to return true verdicts according to the evidence.
"You must put to one side any feelings of sympathy or anger you may have, in one direction or another.
"What is needed is a cool-headed appraisal of the evidence you have heard."
Mr Roache, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, is accused of two counts of rape and four counts of indecent assault involving the complainants.
Mr Roache is said to have raped one woman at his then bungalow in Lancashire and to have raped her again in an adjoining cottage he owned.
Three of the indecent assaults were said to have taken place inside Granada Studios - in the gents toilets, ladies toilets and a dressing room - while the fourth is alleged to have happened in his Rolls-Royce.
Mr Justice Holroyde will finish summing up today and then send out the jury to start its deliberations.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article