The Justice Secretary has asked a senior judge to lead a group to consider what other reforms may be needed following the planned abolition of corroboration.
Kenny MacAskill agreed to set up the group following concerns over the impact of removing the centuries-old requirement for two corroborating pieces of evidence to prove guilt.
The abolition of corroboration is included in the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill.
Mr MacAskill previously told Holyrood's Justice Committee that if the Bill passes he would ensure further consideration is given to other safeguards before abolition takes effect.
In a letter to the committee, he wrote: "I have recently approached a highly respected senior judge to lead an independent reference group in considering other areas of criminal law where reforms may be recommended in light of the proposed abolition of the corroboration requirement.
"I am currently agreeing the details of the remit for this group and we are taking the Lord President's views into account in that process.
"My intention would be for the Government to then bring forward secondary legislation in light of any recommendations made.
"If the corroboration reform is passed, it would not be commenced before this secondary legislation has been approved by the Scottish Parliament.
"I think that this can be done without significant delay to the reform, which was always intended to be implemented in the financial year 2015/16."
The Justice Secretary stressed he remains committed to the reform.
Supporters say the removal of corroboration is necessary to modernise the justice system, and could also help widen access to justice for victims, particularly in cases of rape and domestic violence where corroborating evidence can be difficult to obtain.
Those opposed to the reform fear it could have adverse consequences, such as an increase in miscarriages of justice.
The Justice Committee is currently considering its response to the evidence it has gathered during the first stage of the Bill.
Mr MacAskill added: "I remain fully committed to the proposed removal of the corroboration requirement within the Criminal Justice Bill.
"This will set a solid and fair foundation for the way in which cases proceed to court, moving our system to focus on the overall quality of the evidence available.
"As I have said before, we have always been open to considering additional legal safeguards which may be needed when the corroboration requirement is abolished.
"I have therefore approached a highly respected senior judge to lead an independent reference group in considering other areas of criminal law where reforms may be recommended in light of the proposed abolition of the corroboration requirement.
"The details of the remit are being agreed and will be announced in the coming days."
Scottish Conservative justice spokeswoman Margaret Mitchell said: "This move by Kenny MacAskill reeks of desperation.
"Nothing has changed here - he still wants to push through the ill thought-out and damaging proposals to abolish corroboration.
"Again, the Justice Secretary prefers to organise his own review rather than refer the issue to the Scottish Law Commission.
"Corroboration should be taken out of the Bill and time given to consider it within the context of a wider reform of the law of evidence."
Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Alison McInnes said: "This latest intervention sheds little light on the review but does confirm that Kenny MacAskill is stumbling in the dark.
"His position is illogical and dangerous. The Justice Secretary has conceded that there are risks that come with the abolition of corroboration, yet he asks us to agree to his plans anyway without knowing what safeguards there will be.
"Today's letter prompts me to ask if Kenny MacAskill himself knows - or is he just making it up as he goes along?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article