AN MSP who led the line on amendments critical of same-sex marriage has called for both sides to put their differences behind them and campaign on key issues like poverty.
John Mason had hoped to alter the legislation to ensure no one is "compelled by any means" to solemnise gay marriage.
After his attempts to add "protection" for religious groups were rejected, Mr Mason said he hoped individuals, couples or organisations would not be penalised for supporting a traditional view of marriage, though he said he remained sceptical.
But the Shettleston MSP added: "The debate within the SNP has been good and I got on particularly well with Marco Biagi."
Just as Mr Mason was a quiet stalwart of the opposition case on Tuesday, so Mr Biagi spoke in favour of the reform.
The SNP did face one rebellion when South Lanarkshire Councillor and Minister Bev Auld resigned from the party over the vote in favour of same-sex marriage, but it was claimed that this was a one-off which had been long threatened.
The campaign in favour of equal marriage woke up with a celebratory hangover after a party in a bar near the Scottish Parliament.
Tom French, of the Equality Network, said Scotland now has one of the most progressive equal marriage bills in the world.
He said: "That's why the Equality Network strongly believes the time spent considering and consulting on the bill has been well-and-truly worth it."
But Rev David Robertson, Free Church of Scotland minister in Dundee and director of the Solas Centre for Public Christianity said: "It was with a heavy heart that we listened to the debate in the Scottish Parliament."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article