The apparent TV confession by William Roache that he had bedded up to 1000 women was not put before the jury in his trial.
The revelations about his womanising past to broadcaster Piers Morgan attracted a huge amount of publicity when the Life Stories interview on ITV was screened in April 2012.
The star explained that his infidelity caused the breakdown of his first marriage to actress Anna Cropper - a period of time in which he was accused of the string of sex offences against young girls of which he has been cleared.
His wild behaviour led fellow stars to dub him C**k Roache and he added to being unable to control his sex drive at the time.
Giving evidence, Roache admitted to being unfaithful but told the jurors those affairs were "infrequent" and he was looking for love at the time and not "gratuitous sex".
Prosecutor Anne Whyte, QC, wanted to question the defendant about the interview and present the relevant sections of it as evidence.
But Mr Justice Holroyde said the tone and the context of the interview with the former newspaper editor was "significant" and it could not be seen as an "accurate" or "reliable" guide to his sexual history.
In the interview, Roache said: "There were plenty of girls around.
"I shouldn't have done it. I didn't have any control over my own sex drive. I didn't have the strength to control it."
He told Morgan he had slept with "more than 100" women and when asked if the number was nearer 1000, he said: "Well, I'm not denying it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article