RUSSIA has insisted the Winter Olympics were as safe as any place in the West from militant attacks after Washington warned airports and some airlines toothpaste tubes could be used to smuggle bomb-making materials onto a Russia-bound plane.
Russian forces are on high alert over threats by Islamist militant groups based in the nearby north Caucasus to attack the Winter Games, which offcially begin today. Twin suicide bombings killed at least 34 people in December in Volgograd, some 400 miles north-east of Sochi.
Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak, speaking on the eve of the opening ceremony, said Russian security services were working with colleagues from Europe and North America.
He added: "There is no reason to believe the level of danger in Sochi is greater than at any other point on the planet, be it Boston, London, New York or Washington. We can guarantee the safety of people as well as any other government hosting any mass event."
President Vladimir Putin, who launched a war to crush a rebellion in nearby Chechnya in 1999, has staked his reputation on the Games, which at around £30 billion will be the most expensive in Olympic history.
Islamist guerrillas seeking an independent Islamic state in Chechnya and neighbouring regions of southern Russia have aimed threats at the games, which they argue take place on land seized from Caucasus tribes in the 19th century.
Despite a ring of steel around venues and some 37,000 security personnel on alert, Russia fears a woman suspected of planning a suicide bombing may have slipped through. Her details were circulated last week.
However, security officials believe the risk of an attack is far greater elsewhere in Russia than in Sochi.
President Barack Obama has said he believed Sochi was safe but behind the scenes there has been tension between Russian and US officials, including over concerns the host nation might react with excessive force in the case of an attack and endanger civilian lives.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article