ALEX Salmond had to come to the aid of beleaguered Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill over the planned abolition of the requirement for corroboration in criminal trials, as Tories and LibDems mounted a joint attack at First Minister's Questions.
On the day after the Justice Committee urged the Scottish Government to think again on scrapping corroboration, and Mr MacAskill responded by appointing former judge Lord Bonomy to chair an expert panel looking at additional safeguards for the rights of accused, the row rumbled on.
Rape Crisis Scotland and individual campaigner Mary Ann Davison had been critical of the Justice Committee, which said in its Stage 1 report this week that Mr MacAskill had failed to make the case for abolition of the requirement for corroboration, the historic rule that evidence must come from more than one source.
Sandie Barton, national co-ordinator of Rape Crisis Scotland, said: "Until the justice system is able to respond to more than the small minority of reported rapes which currently make it to court, rape survivors will continue to feel let down by the Scottish justice system. The Justice Committee has failed to stand up for survivors of sexual violence."
Ms Davison, whose experience at the centre of a rape case led to a change in the law over the use of physical force, met Mr MacAskill last week to encourage him to press ahead with his reforms.
She said: "Victims of crime are not seeing justice done, and this, to me, is as much a miscarriage of justice as it is to see an innocent person go to jail."
But Mr Salmond said: "It is not a quick fix, it is a distinguished judge who is looking to make absolutely certain that as this change is made, appropriate safeguards are there to prevent miscarriages of justice."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article