SCOTLAND has scored higher than Monaco, the playground of the rich and famous, in research on property owned by the monied elite.
Estate agent Savills said Scotland comes first in terms of the average value of property portfolios but Monaco is still most attractive to the richest people in the world.
Scotland led its category with the average value of what Savills described as ultra high net worth individuals' holdings of £27 million while Monaco's was £21m.
It found buyers are investing predominantly in private houses and estates.
The significance of private wealth in large real estate transactions has grown threefold since 2009, and has filled the gap left by shrinking debt funding, the researchers said.
Savills analysed the direct real estate holdings of the top tier of the ultra-rich from across the globe.
Scotland is also a place where the rich go to entertain and network, but with an eye on business, it found.
The research also found that there are 199,235 individuals who are classed as ultra rich, or who have net holdings worth £18m or more.
Charles Dudgeon, Savills Head of Rural Agency, said: "Scottish estates, particularly grouse moors and deer forests, attract a wide range of international buyers seeking this niche, rarity item for their property collection.
"For the ultra-rich, steep upkeep and management costs can be inconsequential; owners have been known to helicopter in all the requisite resources in preparation for just a short stay. The key is privacy and speed of access."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article