Only 56% of ScotRail passengers say they are satisfied with the service, according to a Which?
survey of rail travellers.
The company came seventh in a list of the UK's 19 rail operators, which saw the majority of firms score below 50% satisfaction rates.
The results were based on satisfaction with a firm among regular travellers and whether they would recommend that company.
The results contrast with the independent National Rail Passenger Survey, conducted by Passenger Focus, that showed 90% of passengers were happy with ScotRail's service.
Passenger satisfaction with Virgin Trains was 64% in the Which? survey, while 59% of East Coast passengers were satisfied.
The survey found 16% of all passengers had been delayed on their most recent journey, with this figure at 26% for commuters.
Across the UK while 11% said they had cause to complain about the last journey they had taken, three quarters did not.
Which? also asked what passengers felt would improve their journeys and for what they would be prepared to pay more.
Lower ticket prices were top of the wanted list (60%), with 80% saying fares were too high. People also wanted to see more carriages at peak times (35%), promotions on ticket prices (29%), wi-fi (20%) and better reliability (18% - rising to 29% for commuters only.)
Richard Lloyd, from Which?, said: "It's disappointing to see some train companies consistently falling down on the basics of customer service, with dirty and overcrowded carriages and toilets that don't work.
"Seven rail franchises end in the next two years and we want to see passengers' experiences put right at the heart of the tender process."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article